Comments on: Review: W3

By: Serg

Serg — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:02:48 +0000

2 Serena: It’s normal communication issues when you have deal with such world service like this. They are trying be 24/7 service, but it’s required to have some offices in several counries in the world, otherwise it’s just an a trick. Another point – services should love all their clients to be successfull and don’t love money so much.

By: Andrew Jhonson

Andrew Jhonson — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:39:33 +0000

Thanks for this great review. we have also collected a resource of 20 best PSD to HTML service providers on the basis of basic industry fundamentals like market reputation, brand popularity, quality of work, turnaround time and pricing. You can check the list at http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/20-best-psd-to-html-service-providers/

By: Serena

Serena — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:43:24 +0000

I’ve used W3 for a rather large project. I requested 7 day complete time due the amount of pages and details. It ended up taking them 4 weeks longer to complete everything, some things they missed, some things werent working right, some things just didnt make sense how they implemented it, etc. Overall the quality of the code was very good but I honestly don’t think they test anything like they say because they would send me an update and it wouldn’t work in one browser (usually IE or Firefox). The one thing I really didn’t like was their communication portal. It takes an average of 3 days just for them to answer one simple question, and that’s not a good thing when you have tight deadlines and need the project to be completed. I prefer just to pick up the phone and speak to someone asap, but you can’t do that with them. Very annoying.